Sunday, June 16, 2019

Nikon Micro-Nikkor, Nikkor 105mm lenses ~ a closer look

Recently I picked up a Nikon Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 P Ai lens, thinking and hoping that it's out of focus rendition would be similar to the 55mm Micro-Nikkor lenses I have.  Someone on the 'net suggested that the 105mm Micro-Nikkor f/4 is "wickedly" sharp from wide open.  So this blog entry takes a look at this and compares its resolution with three other 105mm Nikkor lenses I have on hand.

Setup -
  • Sony A6000, 100ISO, 2 second delay timer, RawTherapee conversion software 
  • Big Beefy Manfrotto tripod 
  • Lenses compared
    • Nikon Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 P Ai
    • Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 P pre-Ai
    • Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 Ai
    • Nikon Nikkor 35mm to 105mm f/3.5 to f/4.5 AiS zoom at 105mm
  • Lens Turbo II focal length reducer
Note:
It's become obvious to me over the years that nearly all lenses suffer from field curvature.  Some lenses, as we might expect, have more pronounced curved fields than others.  So to account for this, I have taken to shooting two images at each comparison aperture.  The first image is focused in the center of the field, and the second image focuses at the very edge of the field of view.  It is important to note that I'm not attempting to measure how much field curvature there is.  All I'm looking at is, at the edge of the field, how sharp the optic is.  If one photographs flat subject matter, nearly all lens will be more or less out of focus at the edge of the field.

Comparison Results -
[If you click on the image it'll take you to the Flickr hosting site. Once there, look at the file at full resolution. In many cases the differences between lenses is small and likely can't be seen until you take a squint at the comparison at 100 percent.]

Nikon Nikkor 105mm Comparison


Comments -

Comparing the Nikon Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 P Ai to the Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 and f/4.5 zoom, I see that wide open the f/4 Micro-Nikkor lens is indeed quite sharp, though I might not call it "wickedly" sharp.  Focusing at the edges of the frame I see that the Micro-Nikkor is slightly less sharp wide open than the center, but that this cleans up very nicely as the aperture is stopped down.  As for field curvature (which I am not in any measuring, but simply noting), the Micro-Nikkor suffers from a small amount where the 55mm Micro-Nikkors I looked at do not.  I appears to me that to have a perfectly sharp image across a flat field that a user will need to stop down a click or two from wide open.

Looking at the 105mm f/2.5 P and Ai lenses I see that both are sharp in the center wide open.  In the corners, too, the non-Ai P 105mm appears to match the 105mm f/2.5 Ai.  Though it could be noted that field curvature of the early P non-Ai lens stronger than the updated design Ai.  Compared with the Micro-Nikkor, it is difficult to tell a difference when curvature is accounted for in resolution between them across the field.  The only note would be that field curvature is less with the Micro-Nikkor than it's f/2.5 brothers.

Lastly, I took a look at a Nikon Nikkor 35mm-105mm f/3.5-f/4.5 AiS zoom at 105mm.  Wide open resolution suffers across the field.  Stopped down to f/5.6, however, the lens looks quite good in the center and matches the three fixed focal length 105mm lenses here.  At the edges the zoom's resolution appears to clean up rather nicely at f/8.  Regarding field curvature, of the four lenses looked at here this zoom shows the most curvature.  The curvature is quite dramatic, actually.

Saturday, June 15, 2019

Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 and f/2 lenses ~ a closer look

It so happens that I picked up another Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/2 Ai lens.  I owned one when I moved here, sold it, and got to wondering how it compared to my other, older 85mm f/1.8 K pre-Ai.  So here is yet another look at how they compare from a resolution point of view.

Setup -
  • Sony A6000, 100ISO, 2 second delay timer, RawTherapee conversion software 
  • Big Beefy Manfrotto tripod 
  • Lenses compared
    • Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 K pre-Ai
    • Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/2 Ai
  • Lens Turbo II focal length reducer
Note:
It's become obvious to me over the years that nearly all lenses suffer from field curvature.  Some lenses, as we might expect, have more pronounced curved fields than others.  So to account for this, I have taken to shooting two images at each comparison aperture.  The first image is focused in the center of the field, and the second image focuses at the very edge of the field of view.  It is important to note that I'm not attempting to measure how much field curvature there is.  All I'm looking at is, at the edge of the field, how sharp the optic is.  If one photographs flat subject matter, nearly all lens will be more or less out of focus at the edge of the field.

Comparison Results -
[If you click on the image it'll take you to the Flickr hosting site. Once there, look at the file at full resolution. In many cases the differences between lenses is small and likely can't be seen until you take a squint at the comparison at 100 percent.]

Nikon Nikkor 85mm Comparison


Comments -

Comparing the Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 K pre-Ai to the Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/2 Ai, I see that wide open the early f/1.8 lens is slightly less sharp than the newer design f/2 Ai.  At the edges of the frame, the f/1.8 K pre-Ai lens clearly lags the f/2 Ai.  Yet both lenses sharpen up very nice from f/4, and from f/4 on down the aperture range both lenses appear to be equal in the center and edges of the frame.

In terms of field curvature, I see that the f/1.8 K pre-Ai suffers from greater field curvature than the newer f/2 Ai optic (remember, I'm not trying to measure the field curvature, only noting the curvature in relative terms).

Since I don't sharpen the comparison images in any way, I thought it might be interesting to see what a rather aggressive unsharp mask might do to images from both lenses at wide open and f/2.8 in the center and at the edges.  The USM was set to a 2 pixel radius and a 0.5 contrast step.  This is pretty steep and I normally put the USM image in a separate layer and adjust its opacity over the original image to balance the harshness of the USM to make the final image more "film-like" (I feel some of the software tools can make an image appear "artificial" and cell-phone-like).

In both cases, the USM makes the wide open and f/2.8 images appear sharper than their f/4 to f/8 non-USM equivalents on the two lenses.  The f/1.8 K pre-Ai lens still lags the f/2 Ai wide open.  But, this shows what is possible if one wants to clean up an image that was shot at the widest aperture.  The results can be pretty darned impressive.

Monday, June 03, 2019

Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/2 and f/1.8 ~ point light source comparison


For many years I looked at just one dimension of commercially available optics - resolution.  With this blog entry I continue to look at other aspects of optical performance.  For the series of postings I look at under, neutral, and over corrected spherical aberration in out of focus rendition on subject matter behind the point of focus.

Setup -
  • Sony NEX5T, ISO 100, 2 second timer
  • Big Beefy Manfrotto tripod
  • Lenses using with a Lens Turbo II focal reducer -
    • Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/2 Ai
    • Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 K pre-Ai
  • NOTE1: Lenses were shot at their widest apertures only
  • NOTE2: Out of focus samples are from points _behind_ the point of focus to compare background out of focus rendition
  • RawTherapee to convert RAW files into black and white and to set the black levels
  Comparison -

If you click on the following image you can inspect it at 100 percent.

Nikon Nikkor 85mm lenses ~ Point Light Source Comparison


Comments -

NOTE: I feel the Lens Turbo II focal reducer adds a bit of under-corrected spherical aberration.

The Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/2 Ai lens shows under corrected spherical aberration as well as a bright edge ring that suggests over correction around the outside of the out of focus disk.  In normal use, I expect the out of focus rendition to be "harsher" than, say, the next lens from Nikon.
The Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8 K pre-Ai lens shows classic under corrected spherical aberration with a bright dot in the center of a smooth disk.  In normal use, I expect the out of focus rendition to be "delicate" (using Nikon's own description of the effect) and smooth across the field.


Resources -

For further information on how the topic of out of focus rendition, optical properties, and Nikon lens design history, please refer to the following -

A PhD thesis on the impact of "soft focus" lenses on the history of photography - http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/handle/10023/505

An excellent starting point for understanding out of focus rendition (I might not completely agree with his interpretations/observations, but his foundation of understanding is quite good) - http://jtra.cz/stuff/essays/bokeh/

Nikon lens design histories - https://imaging.nikon.com/history/story/

Point light source discussions - https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4031515

Zeiss comments on optical design -  https://lenspire.zeiss.com/photo/en/article/how-does-zeiss-define-bokeh-an-interview-with-dr-stefan-ballmann

Metabones Focal Reducer whitepaper - https://www.metabones.com/assets/a/stories/Speed%20Booster%20White%20Paper.pdf